Keystone File

Not to necessarily read:


Keystone XL pipeline bill fails in the Senate (Vox),
Mother Jones, Crooks and Liars ?


C-Labels...
[Keystone XL, Filibuster, NFRY]


The point is that it is hard to gauge references to filibusters such as they are engaged these days*. 
*how long and counting ?

[update: When is a thing, not a thing?  When it is constitutional[!]]
[Keystone cops?]

The Last Boogieman?

[@ second google]
First (b.s.)
That's the ticket.
Not to keep it under my hat, but it all started in The Atlantic(!)
Don't take it Parsenal[!](?)

(FN#): a. Dichotomy of sorts., b. Proxymoron? , c. What, Me Worry?
[!] a. Parson Perspective 
(?) The Take Away? - Commander-in-Chief Obama - Irony versus Hypocrisy
An aside. War on Semantics?
The Nexus: Neo-Context

[Try-Lateral O-mission?]
But speaking of jobs... - filibuster-is - Neo-Context  [!]
Re: F(j)ord Blossom:
BlogSpot Has A New "Blogger"
escapement?
Middle C?

Bad News, Good News.

For America.

Hint*: Reference** to 2014 being potential loss of Senate for dems, then Republicans must get something done in Congress in face of potential Obama veto if not Democratic filibuster, will bode well for 2016.  

* need update
** need b.s.

[EW, TC, Now]
To reads.

ether note

Labelism*
A.
B.
C.

D-homericization.

{^} Weak Ends with Alex Witt: Nuclear Fallout^ / do it now ?  Cave to Republicans, no compromise.  No Filibuster.

* inspiration V. conspiration
[endless v. priceless**]
[4mRunes; Mach, Mach., Maz...low ! ? ]
** post-4mR...  ^*^ You are under a spell you think I suffer.  There may be some issue with the method... of counting ... because ... before ....bring... up for votes.   The court ... you call it is actually court ... as they had no problem with previous ... and it is funny to think ...district*** would not be busy enough ^*^  (Re-clipsis). D'Ribble Re-quilting.

 

*** Marvel (no it's Mani)

 {^} Reference to Leap /Difficulty in  finding link.
^ anachronistic insert (Steve Benen/Rachell Maddow)
[alleged in draft]

Between Two Farces.

Force A. Business
Force B. Freedom

Now that is climate change, the change in tone of my heading and lede or ship some are in. But my original intent was in all due respect to the opposition of the Affordable Care Act.  The farces?  You can keep your healthcare, not that the government is a monopoly and can tell them to keep you and they are not able to change. Now that is a swift navigator.

BTW: If some of my perspective is lost in translation it may be because I used them elsewhere.*  Example:  It takes more than three points for perspective, but one more to fix it.

* Knot so related Google Find: Paul ? Not yet read.[9-30-13 now not so unrelated, not to mention AB||BA.]
(insert order: 1,2,3, 4,6,5) Not that it was a $ixth $ents or B.S.[!]

9-30-13 2B Slighty(1) less(1e/t) obtuse(2).(2A&e/e)Lemon Ship /Obtusity?  xG Ctrl F(2) "'choice".
Note: 2B & xG(FC)
[update here @  =. ]

Between two other farces, and The Cycle.  Democracy and the Republic pop U lace.  I am talking congres as it is divided.  President Obama won his election, the Democrats took the Senate and the popular vote for the House is also a Democratic majority.  If not for Obamacare?  I think not.  There must be an end to the compromise and hostage taking.  Not to mention cats and dogs on Martin Bashir.  A clean vote would pass in the House.  I guess it is a filibuster of one, the House Speaker under the Hastert* rule**.  Knot so random insert.
* 10-1-13 **

MAY 2013 Footnote Page Four

5-1-13:  More (b.s.)*= Nail Meet F--C---[!], More Breaking Filters, Regime Rhetoric Reply, Flash Back(s.c. ?), Fast Forward(s.c.)   / / Continued from FP3: (guilt by & swift craft, done) Line+to+cross: A(a), B, C, D, E(e), F, G, H, I, J(j), K(k), LOL, M.  Line+top+walk: A, B, C(c), D(d), E(e), F(f)  
Rise+Tide: A(a), B(b), C, D,  E (e), F(f)**, G(g)**, H(h) . (it is not so much to keep up with the message but to record the change

* not exactly(WTO) but blog search hit the fulcrum
** expired must refresh also

5-10-13 Knot? A. Poetic Justice,  B. Justice?,  c,  D. Technical Difficulties!, E. Pass the Trillion.

5-15-13 TFR : Not to pan.[ A., (fn)FOR D..., Budget Bandits?, D., E., F.The Read C?, G., H.Jabber Walkie?, I.Pun it?, J.Game+Lock, K.Connecting the Dots, L.Filibuster Bluster*, M.Knot Even, N.Re:Figure,  O.All Politics is Local!, P.Me a , Q, R. ] ( Mind your P's and Q's.) Speaking of brackets!

5-17-13 Not to jump in the Lacuna [!]

5-30-13: RE Tan Gent shall ism ?

Red Acted Month

That's not the ticket [!]

The point of the seqester was to force a grand bargain.  Now that Republicans are using it as leverage, the Democrats may use it as leverage.  That would be to not go piecemeal.  Democrats can vote on their conscience and their constituency.  The House can field a budget, the Senate may filibuster and the President may veto.  Witch plays perfectly into the DNC* of getting her done.

* gnot [!][fp ? ! ? ] Bazinga Alter Bashir!

Filibuster Bluster*

Belated call.
Senate to debate gun control, sort of.
Not to Maddow** it.

*68-31
** (FP!)***

a, b, c, d ... ? ! ?
[a long way to fine men]

4-12-13 So neither of us have to.[!] ?  Knot !
*** Footnotes Page inserted
(Follow Up ? [!]) That's the ticket. Who's serious!
Not to have completed a ribble.

4-13-13 Note: Bane or Fineman (under 4-12-13) Stay tuned [?] !
4-15-13 Of similar note ? Thatcher Notes ?

FOOTNOTE PAGE TWO APRIL 2013

4-1-13: (b.s.) Fools - Pre-post-or-us? (sc), Swift Reading!(ow) (sc), Contempt for Courage, The Bully... (sc)

4-2-13 (b.s.)of sorts[!]?  Order actually read? The Treason of the Intellectuals, by Chris Hedges, Lessons From a Comeback, by Paul Krugman, Bush’s Economic Policies Bankrupted U.S., Reagan Budget Director Says, by Tracy Bloom on (David Stockman).

4-3-13 two too dimention? (b.s.) Fear and Running, It is about time...(sc), Dimentionalism(sic) (sc), Over Helming.(sc), Place Holder? (sc) (dimensionalism M-bed?)  Note.

$-$*-13: B4 I get too E-volved, I should note a few original intents, prior(a){i}^ two the heading I settled on. ^ o w [?]
[ Re: Too Evolved ? (b.s.): A, B. Fiddle Sticks^ , C, D. Primary Boogeyman, E. We Can't Wait, F. Following results. :/: ]

*cap or shift pun disKantinued
4-9-13 ** Re:Figure The resemblance to a stop sign is subtle but more symptomatic of a go sine.
4-15-13 From Bank to Bagel there is a lot to Un-M-bed.
4-16-13 "parsing": emphasis links
4-22-13: Careful what you S.F. (i.e. search 4? )
4-23-13 : darn may be closer.
"we+weave" /  A(sc), (b)...when first we practice..., C, (d)Oh, what a web..., E (Borrow and Twist- a surfing metaphor?), ]+[,  F, g, h, I(sc), J, K(sc), L(sc), M, N(sc)
"delta+dawn" / A(sc), B(sc), C(sc)
4-24-13 2nd line (sc)copy paste:  Pun it?, Game+Lock, Connecting the Dots, / , /, Filibuster Bluster*.
4-25-13 Not to bury the lede or G! (nor D, E, F?)
4-30-13 Pardon the Live chronism [!]

FOOTNOTE PAGE APRIL 2013

4-1-13 April * 1st. Big Bagel Theory: Springs from labels. (the * 1st are tangent shall references to April.) Not to be shell games for grown ups.

4-2-13: Sorting by order read(ge me oh) or inserted(heck tricks) followed by lines 3, 1 and 4. [** follow up?]

4-3-13 Charlotte's Web: Original search(Share) Ctrl F two "montage"('n Angle) / Not to[FP2] dimention.

4-4-13  (b.s. ) funny+thing: A. A Funny Thing Happened... (sc)[!] B... (Kantinued...?)
 [FP2.(oh) [Re:asterisk or FP (too.oh)]  Re:A & (sc) i.e. Not to create an MU puzzle, but please scroll over and click on (sc)]

4-5-13 TGIF *NFR  Not Fully Read.

4-9-13 Re:Figure & FC: Speaking of bread crumbs ...

Filibuster Bluster* 4-11-13 original title 68-31 to insert Maddow Link. (b.s.) jinx: A. I feel like a Tea Partier!(sc), B. Go Purple!(sc)

4-12-13 : Tan Gents from Mottos.  Bottom line is funny.  Not !  X, Y, ... [_] <- a=""> the solution is in the tax structure, the problem is in the Norquist. Francis Perkins and the Fiscal Party.

4-15-13:  insert Read (footnote tweak). Lost Thatcher reference(to be exhumed)? And OW/bubblenomics ?

4-16-13 Emphasis must be laid on parsing and timing, if not iron knee of profits.  Not to further M-bed or spec U late. (b.s.) tail+: A, B, C Tact and Tack

4-17-13: Now fully read. Ctrl F "not read".  Irony of threats and political dynamics as undiplomatic and unjust.[ Ctrl F "na•ve": set theory and justice.]

4-18-13: As to two "too"[!]  Not to Re-Knot the bottom line, but I thought that gun-control legislation would have a political solution to the obstruction of fear mongers. I had thought that Rebublicans could sign their letter promising a filibuster that would fail.  Four Democrats joined them for their political survival, but their votes alone would not have tipped the cloture.

4-22-13 Math is next 2...?

4-23-13 [Ctrl F] is not the pun but the practical. "F" = [find] but also "filter" and "fervor".  Nor to pun  on 4F or broaden the base.

4-24-13 First change? To read "?" mark.  Second line lede or ship!

4-25-13  Two Reads OW... (font is next to #$cape italicism)
4-26-13: Labelism(on the QT),  Social Media, Boston Strong, A^ peas meant or Green Genes?[!(o w)?] ^ found by blog search^^ of (red+blue+green) ^^(not the ticket)freedom from dickens?
4-29-13:  ***(insert) 4-29-13 Earlier Q.T.[but seriously! (O-W)] Rachel Maddow(2) , Steve Benen(1) & (8)... of Con Fluence or curve
balls?

4-30-13 Lose, Lose Ben Labolt on NOW /
4-30-13 to pun on ING ? (AP?, B, C(c), D, E(e), F, g, )

Democracy Upheld! (5-4) (R/x)**

Not to spike the ball. 
Mandate will become a tax!

Well... that was my idea or interpretation of the bill, but that was FOX News' claim.
But my original ball that might have been a spike was "Democrats Upheld" but Obamacare or the Affordable Care Act, is a bi-partisan bill, so I cannot claim a victory for Democrats.  It is a victory for congress and the political progress.  It is a victory for Obama and bi-partisanship.  Not that victory is a Burger King*, or having it my way.  I should admit that recently I thought that part of the ruling would be kicking the can down the road, since some of the provisions don't go into effect till 2014. 
Oops, in plain English, I may have been right about the can.
Senator Dan Coates on Jansing&Co. claimed lack of bi-partisanship.  That claim is a victory for politics and bi-partisanship.  The ACA was passed under reconciliation.  It was not a Democratic bill, but a democratic bill.  If the President can be blamed(see choice/bold-underlined) for congress not getting things done, when the Republicans obstruct with filibusters.  Republicans cannot have all the changes they could get and not take credit for them by voting against the bill to claim partisanship by not being able to filibuster. 
If anything this is a vaccine to the insanity of the partisan Issa Committee which doctor for the NRA. 
Pump it up! Obama Cares !  Chris Matthews has a very interesting Stupid Conspiracy.  On the other hand, I thought that the obvious was missing in the court arguments.  I think that means that it was plain that a loss of tax break is not a penalty, or is it the semantics of taxes.

* whose weigh or beef?
** still looking for the bullet ratio aka up 'n over or held/turned [People/$]
[of and for the people, over money]
[The real in'f-fable might be taxes/commerce. The High Five ?  4GETIT?
It is a win for Politics, Bi-Partisanship, Obama, and the Economy!  But according to Raw Money?  "A Choice"... between Government standing between you and big corporations or big corporations standing between you and your health care.(Bold over underlined ? )]
Not to strike a punchline, but bottomline:  Obama is Bush! A Political Capitalist!
Romney is Kerry!  A nuanced flip-flopper.  But only in the light of...(the president speaks)***

(asterisked anachronism888baneORspeaks.)

***  TBA
[Coff E T A B L E ]
[AM H&H game change? Tweet Morning Joe! ET? MR doc RM RL btw: NFIB v. SSHH$ ]
[PC v MF ! (?)]

(photo credit)

[Hi5-4th'tableCongressISjobWON!]
[Congress is open to a peel!]

[I don't have the rest of the story to back this up, but I think that Norman Goldman analyzes NFIB v. SSHHS the way I have.  Not only that but Justice Thomas or the D$ent may have bust the fallacy that health care is commerce.  Not only that but I think that Justice Roberts figured out how it can work or not work depending on congress, as I think that congress could have if they had more cooperation rather than partisanship.  NorMan really cut through it with a caller, regarding small business and Mitt RobbedMe.  How do you know when Mitt is telling a lie?  He is either talking about Obama or economics, if not both at the same time. Just between me and we, it seems that without fully reading the Affordable Care Act or the full decision, the Supreme Court seems to have understood it better than it was argued, but not much more than I thought it was.  The catch is that we are patching together various interpretations that make a decision that still takes some tweaking by congress.  It puts taxes and states at the table.  The catch seems to hinge on the powers of congress and the definition of commerce.  As Chris Matthews was want to call it a Stupid Conspiracy, I may lean toward calling it a Swift Strategy, despite the games some play with acronyms, initialism or caricatures.]
NG
GN
UP v UC
Unprecedent President vis a vis Unprecedented Congress.
Now that is PC! Due(or vu doo) the Math!
(Bush/Obama x Obstructive/Health Care)
[I would like to thank three people for helping me understand GeOhMeTry[!] Randi Rhodes, Lawrence O'Donnel and Michael [links 6-29] Moore... Well...there are host of others but in particular RR and LO, have brilliant insight if not intel.  Randi a quick take on Obama, Lawrence an understanding of the political process, and MM a way with the message and the medium.  MR-RM.
Plausible Deniability/Plausible Incompetence/ Deniable Competence. That is the voodoo some do.
[Upheld -  U p h e l d !]

Republicans Filibuster Economy

There, no more misledership!
Durbin Calls for Change to Filibuster Rule

Content from Legislation not Politics!(post asterisk *)
[Sorting it out: It was Eric Cantor who accused the President of politics over legislating. That is a ridiculous line of argument. As someone said about the market operating on society, like Siamese Twins performing brain surgery on themselves. But taking it to the bank or kitchen or pulpit,(the ridiculous line that is), the answer is in one word. VOTE! Up or down, package or separately, limit the filibuster, use reconciliation, WHATEVER! A vote is taking a stand. Take it and run on it, not from it. BUT THEN WE HAVE THE MESSAGE TO GET THROUGH THE MESS AGE OF THE MEDIA, not even punning on ledership. The American Jobs Act did not get voted down, it failed a cloture vote(50-49). That means that even if three more Democrats had voted with the rest, it would have been 53-46, but it takes 60 votes people!]

(*) post-asterisk at link, go there for more links, but I have rearranged two in this content: If Republicans want to walk the talk, of Where are the Jobs?* Then vote on every last one of these, as well as the American Jobs Act[*], and see who will be left on the ship of fools.

NOW MORE CONTEXT... later (Well maybe)
[just posted from draft]

Legislation not politics!

[Can't Or Bane Or...]
(10-17-11 or change: added sub-heading with links only)

Was it Cant or Bane or, who said such.
Well, I paraphrase, but it was an attack on President Obama and the American Jobs Act. The idea that he was playing politics by giving them a jobs plan, while it is the legislature's job to create legislation. Sure there is a disagreement as to what creates jobs, but there should be no disagreement that it is legislation and it is political.

Plan B? Walking the Plank? Take up or down votes:

If Republicans want to walk the talk, of Where are the Jobs?* Then vote on every last one of these, as well as the American Jobs Act[*], and see who will be left on the ship of fools.

[*] The American Jobs Act.

[This is Truman's kitchen and Teddy's stick or carrying a lever but no pit bully.]

[Sorting it out: It was Eric Cantor who accused the President of politics over legislating. That is a ridiculous line of argument. As someone said about the market operating on society, like Siamese Twins performing brain surgery on themselves. But taking it to the bank or kitchen or pulpit,(the ridiculus line that is), the answer is in one word. VOTE! Up or down, package or separately, limit the filibuster, use reconciliation, WHATEVER! A vote is taking a stand. Take it and run on it, not from it. BUT THEN WE HAVE THE MESSAGE TO GET THROUGH THE MESS AGE OF THE MEDIA, not even punning on ledership. The American Jobs Act did not get voted down, it failed a cloture vote(50-49). That means that even if three more Democrats had voted with the rest, it would have been 53-46, but it takes 60 votes people!]